Give Me Strength
On Tuesday, the Tories hit out at lads’ mags, and someone wrote into thelondonpaper about the issue, beginning her letter with “I’d like to point out that I’m not a feminist, a man-hater, a lesbian or a Tory.”. Unfortunately, my email didn’t get published, but hey - this is what blogs are for, right?
Marissa (Too Much Smut, Tuesday);
You started your letter by saying “I’d like to point out that I’m not a feminist, a man-hater, a lesbian or a Tory.” - I’d like to ask, what exactly is wrong with lesbians and feminists? Misandrists, or man-haters, I would take issue with, and perhaps Tories too, but you make it sound like calling somebody a lesbian or a feminist is an insult! Look at it this way: lesbians like women. What does it matter what they have between their legs? Lesbians aren’t all feminists, and feminists aren’t all lesbians.
As for feminists, we’re simply fighting for the rights that women deserve. To quote Rebecca West, I dare to express sentiments which differentiate me from a doormat. I’m a feminist, and I’m okay with that, because I recognise that feminism isn’t about going on hunger strike or chaining yourself to Parliament anymore - that was 100 years ago - and it may seem over the top now, but look at what it, and feminism later in the 20th century, did for us. Do you have a credit card? Do you have access to birth control? Can you wear trousers to work or school or college? I’m not saying that not wanting to label yourself feminist is wrong, but to make it sound like an insult is just going to scare people away from this very important movement: “feminist” isn’t an insult or an accusation, and it isn’t about hating men: it’s about looking after yourself and your daughters and your grand-daughters, making sure that women get and keep the respect we deserve.
The next day, I opened the paper to find ranting from others; people saying “but girls’ mags are just as bad!” and “well, the women who pose are okay with it, so what’s the big deal?” - well, yes: girls choose to pose nude for lads’ mags. Yes: guys do it for the girls’ mags. Yes: girls’ mags are rife with “articles” on how to score, how to impress your bloke in bed, how to have better orgasms… whether you think the lads’ mags or the girls’ mags are worse, Nuts and Scarlet both paint the image women desperate for sex and gossip, and perhaps it’s true for some women but here’s one woman it’s not true for: me. My idea: scrap the bloody lot.
In other news, some women have been complaining about contraception, and how pharmaceutical companies are misogynist because the majority of contraception available is for female use, e.g. the Pill, hormonal implants, diaphragms and IUDs (to name just a few).
Newsflash: this isn’t misogyny. It’s science. Men can buy condoms and have vasectomies, and many do. They can’t take the Pill or get implants because the science for male hormonal contraceptive devices doesn’t exist yet. That’s about all there is to it.
I sometimes wonder if I’d be a calmer person if I didn’t read the news.
Posted: August 8th, 2008 under feminism, rant.
Tags: feminism, politics, rant
Comments
Comment from Katie
Time August 8, 2008 at 10:38 am
I do realise that, but take for example the male pill: it was trialled and although effective in some cases, not reliable enough to go on general market. Two thirds of men surveyed say they would take a pill - that’s a higher number than I was expecting when I researched it, especially given the numbers of women I know, including myself, who won’t use hormonal contraceptives.
So, we get back to the point that a male pill has been created, tested, and deemed unreliable, thus the science does not exist yet, and not through a lack of research.
Ref: http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/mens_health/body_sexpill.shtml
Comment from Friend of Tofu
Time August 8, 2008 at 11:40 am
Actually, the reason that misogyny in contraceptive devices has come to light is because of a couple of reports saying some male hormonal contraceptives under development were abandoned close to completion because the drug companies involved didn’t think they could adequately market hormonal contraceptives to males…
Comment from Katie
Time August 8, 2008 at 12:06 pm
I already know about this, and it’s not what I’m referring to: I’m talking about how some people are saying that none of the companies bother to even research it because it isn’t marketable, which is blatantly not true.

Comment from Philippa
Time August 8, 2008 at 1:53 am
You realise that the pharmaceutical companies are often the ones that do the science, right? Low levels of research into male contraception can indeed be a sign of misogyny, and the more general expectation that women deal with all the hormonal consequences (often cited as a reason for not doing the research - “men wouldn’t put up with it”) very much is.