About

Katie is a 21 year old girl geek from Manchester. She likes photography and books and people and knitting and bellringing and computers and games and bad jokes and STUFF. If she could, she'd have an Internet connection implanted in her brain and caffeine on prescription. Yes, she's one of those.
Read more...

Twitter

  • I have taken to snuggling under @firinel's electric blanket whilst spodding, so I am flavour of the month with the cats, yay! \o/ 5 hrs ago
  • Watching @marnanel coding in Shavian o.O 1 day ago
  • It seems everyday I say I'm going to get up at a sensible time, I get up even later -_- 1 day ago
  • More updates...

Posting tweet...

Blogroll

Support the Open Rights Group

Categories

Tags

 Meta

Date however you like.

Miriam at Feministing posted today about long-distance relationships. Some people took it as an attack, and the Feministing team leapt in, defending the article and its author.
This is a ridiculous, offensive article: Miriam may not have intended it the way it was interpreted by some of her readers, but nonetheless, her post has irritated me.

If someone is trying to raise questions about a situation, they need to assess the bad and the good sides, and she hasn’t. She’s made a good start, but she hasn’t finished yet.
A blog on feminism will have a feminist lean to its posts: that’s understandable - but I don’t feel long distance relationships are a feminist issue, and because of that, this post needs to look at both sides of the situation and ask not just what the bad things are about LDRs but why people get involved in them, aside from the obvious that they love someone who lives far away (there are reasons - we aren’t just gluttons for punishment). Because it hasn’t, people have understandably got their backs up; the third comment hit the nail right on the head:

“I don’t like the idea of anyone telling me who I should love.”

Not only that, but “it didn’t work for me” is never a good argument to back up “it’s shit”. An LDR didn’t work for Miriam, thus LDRs are bad for Miriam. They’re good for me. That doesn’t make them good, and I don’t claim that it does - I can totally see that they don’t work for some people, and that’s okay. We’re all different. That’s what makes us human.

As someone currently in three relationships, all of which are long distance, ranging from 100 miles to 3500 miles, I will happily speak out against any campaign against long distance relationships, and Miriam who jokes about such, because I am happy in my relationships and I won’t sit back and take an assault on the safe, sane, consensual way I do my relationships.

I am happy. Yes, I miss my partners. Yes, it hurts to be alone sometimes. Yes, it’s horrible not knowing how long until you see your partner again… but on the other hand, in those days before you do see each other once more, little can mute your excitement, and when you run into each other’s arms again for the first time, the adrenaline rush that comes with that is so intensely wonderful, I would guess it’s better than any artificial high. You don’t just get the first hug, the first date, the first kiss … you get a new one every time you see each other - and of course, the time you spend together is worth so much more.

I can’t help who I fall in love with or where they live. I didn’t even have the choice of moving away or not: I have never lived in the same town or city as any of my partners. If I’m in love with someone many miles away and we need to get on a train or a plane to go see each other, then damnit, we will do.

Comments

Comment from Depresso
Time October 24, 2008 at 6:03 pm

Hey, followed your link on feministing. I agree completely. Ooooh, that codswallop-parading-as-feminism has really wound me up. Who is Miriam to mock my (and yours, and so many others’) realtionship choices, simply because it didn’t work for her? Gah!

Comment from Friend of Tofu
Time October 24, 2008 at 8:26 pm

She’s got something of a point about the flying issue, but it’s not a very well-thought-out post at all.

That’s community blogging for you!

Comment from DC
Time October 25, 2008 at 1:38 pm

For some reason I couldn’t access the actual article. What you say makes sense, though. If you happen to love someone who lives hundreds of miles away, what can you do? *sigh*

Comment from Scarlett
Time October 25, 2008 at 2:37 pm

Here via feministing too - I can’t BELIEVE that they have defended Miriam’s post, and am just so disappointed and angry with the site right now. Yeah, making ‘jokes’ about telling women who they should and should not be in relationships with is just *exactly* what feminism is about.

Comment from Vicki
Time October 27, 2008 at 12:25 am

Well put.

For that matter, if one LDR didn’t work for Miriam, does that mean LDRs are bad for her? (It might—I don’t have enough data. But if one heterosexual relationship with someone in her own city failed, we wouldn’t expect her to give up on men and on dating locally.)

[I wasn't thrilled with Amanda Marcotte's implications that those of us with LDRs are being unrealistic about adult life, either: I'm 44, and none of my partners has been in college in a long time.]

Comment from cat
Time October 27, 2008 at 5:53 pm

Thanks. I’ve been going through a lot of emotional turmoil lately with my own LDR, and I’ve needed support from people in similar situations. I’ve been feeling guilty enough as it is being in one, for reasons not necessarily connected with the environment or to my own personal health, so that Slate article and Feministing didn’t exactly make me feel sunshine-y and puppy dogs. I’m sick of defending myself to other people and to myself. Thank you.

Write a comment